Down through the centuries and particularly in modern times, Christians of various persuasions have set dates for Jesus’s return. They typically base their conclusions on prophetic biblical texts they presume to be definitive for this purpose. Of course, all previous dates set earlier than today have failed because, obviously, Jesus hasn’t returned yet. The question is, should they even be doing this?
Though there have been many, one missed prediction in particular comes to mind. In the 1980’s when I was still a young Christian, a man by the name Edgar Whisenant, a bible student and NASA engineer published a book titled “88 Reasons Why the Rapture Will Be in 1988”. He based his prediction on his particular approach to biblical numerology and the fact that Israel became a nation again in 1948. One “generation” from then, which he mistakenly concluded was 40 years, gets one to 1988. He proceeded to back that up with his interpretation of many Old Testament prophecies, largely from Daniel. He stated that he had amassed 23,000 clues from biblical sources that proved his conclusion. However, the only thing he was successful at was selling his book which was published by the World Bible Society. He sold over 4 1/2 million copies and shipped 300,000 free copies to ministers across America. He was famously quoted as saying “I would stake my life on Rosh Hashana 1988.”
So, using Whisenant’s example, what’s wrong and what’s right about this?
Let’s start with what’s wrong. If Whisenant had simply stated “it’s my opinion that Jesus will return in 1988″, he would have merely been sharing his conclusions based on his personal studies, laying them out for all to judge. But that’s not what he did. He presented his conclusions as firm and undeniable and if it didn’t happen as he stated then the bible is lying to us. Unfortunately, many of his followers believed him and took action such as selling their properties and blindly taking his advice. When Jesus didn’t return, they were not only devastated, but many rejected Christianity altogether. Whisenant meanwhile basked in the millions he reaped from vulnerable easily deceived Christians. A significant portion of Christianity became a laughingstock in secular and Christian media. So, altogether not a good experience.
Let’s look at what could have been right about this incident. If Whisenant had humbly and honestly shared his studied opinion and opened it to scholarly debate, it could have served to educate Christians and the world about prophetic scriptures. It might have spurred Christians into serious bible study which ultimately could only have positive effects. Surely, Christians need to be informed about biblical prophecy so they can be alert and watching for the signs Jesus taught and how they fit with Old Testament teachings. We cannot fulfill Jesus’s command to watch if we are ignorant concerning what to watch for. In other words, even errant teaching such as Whisenant’s could have value if it prompts Christians into deeper study. And that is exactly what it did for me. It made me aware that prophetic scriptures just might be pointing to Jesus’s return, perhaps even in my lifetime. It sparked a curiosity in me that led to a deeper study of eschatology. But the question remains: should I use scripture study to put a date on the second coming?
It seems quite unlikely that God through His prophets and His Son would provide for us a wealth of clues to determine the timing of Jesus’s coming if He expected us to ignore them. Jesus severely criticized the Jews for not recognizing the time of His first coming. (Luke 12:56, 19:44). They certainly had plenty of biblical precedent. We have even more. We not only have the entire New Testament, but Jesus also gave us His Holy Spirit who will tell us of things to come. (John 16:13). There simply is no spiritual reason why we should not be fully engaged in attempting to ascertain the timing of our Lord’s return as part of our Christian experience. Once assured of our salvation, we should long for and “love His appearing”. (1 Timothy 4:8, Titus 2:13).
In my personal studies, I am currently of the opinion that while we can speculate about certain dates, it’s too early to be exacting. I do believe, however that we can determine the “season” of His return, which I also believe we are in now, even as I write this. It seems obvious to me that the biblical events leading up to Daniel’s 70th week (the last 7 years of this age) are current, such as the “beginning of birth pangs” Jesus talked about, the maturation of “mystery Babylon”, and the alignment of key individuals and nations. Once we are in the middle of the 70th week, the timing of which will be unmistakable, we will be able to accurately predict a date. I address all this in detail in my book; “Last Days Events-Sequence and Synchrony“. You can get it at Amazon Books both in paperback and Kindle format. It’s also on Kindle Unlimited for zero cost.
So, to address the title question, I would say yes, have a go at it. But don’t be rigidly dogmatic about your conclusions so not to be disillusioned. You’ll likely be wrong but better off because of the scripture study involved. Just remember that the odds of being correct on a specific date are quite small at this time but will increase as we near His return. Be sure to use proper scripture exegesis guided by a sound objective hermeneutic, and you’ll profit as one always does when studying God’s Word. Who knows? Maybe you’ll get it right!
Maranatha, Jim